If you cannot see these differences, you are not ready for opening theory because those are the BASICS of the opening. The attack is not on e4 because fxe4 allows Nxe4 and an outpost for the White Knight, hence f5-f4 instead. ![]() Also, with e4 and c4 played, d4 is weak, and hence moves like e5 by Black, and often looking to lodge a knight on d4. White puts his bishop on f4, the pawn moves to e3, the f1 knight comes out to f3, his b1 knight goes to d2, and white solidifies the center with pawn to c3. In the Kings Indian, with the pawn on c4 and not c2, moves like b7-b5-b4 are almost impossible. Accelerated London System (2h5) The Accelerated london system is a very solid opening choice for white and is not easy for black to crack. However, with no pawn on c4, moves like b5 by Black are easier to execute and especially if White plays f4 or Nf3 instead of f3, the b-pawn can dislodge the Knight on c3, leading to an attack on the e4-pawn. ![]() Professional players spend a lot of time working on the openings in-depth, sometimes until the possible endgames that can arise. With the pawn on c2, in the Pirc, the moment the c3-knight moves, like maybe after f3, the c-pawn can protect d4. In modern chess having a sound opening, the repertoire is an essential part of achieving success in tournaments. The main difference between the Pirc and Kings Indian is White's c-pawn. ![]() If you cannot understand the difference between the Pirc and Kings Indian and the differences in ideas between the two, then you do not understand opening concepts and therefore are not ready for opening theory.Ĭan you answer in words why the Pirc and Kings Indian are nothing alike?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |